Family TV Viewing Saturated With Foul Language

Family First NZ says that family television viewing is ‘saturated’ with foul language and sexual content.

A Family First investigation of 15 programmes on four free-to-air channels between 6pm and 8.30pm over a period covering November 4 – 13 found a saturation of foul language, sexual innuendo, and promotion of Adult Only programmes.

“We were appalled at the constant diet of sexual content and foul language on free-to-air television during times when families should feel safe when watching programmes,” says Bob McCoskrie, National Director of Family First NZ.

Words featured during supposed family viewing times included b**ch, fu*k, a*s, pi**, bast**d, bl**dy, and included expressions such as “holy f**k”, “sex with your mother”, “shove bottle up his a** ”, and “a** bit** ”.


Among the worst offenders was Two And A Half Men which screens on TV2 at 7.30pm. Offensive language included “son of a bit** “, “damn” “hell”, “a** “, and constant sexual talk including references to “licking”, “stiffy”, “orgasms”, and “masturbation”.

Another programme of huge concern was Just Shoot Me which screens on TV2 at 6pm every weekday night. The two programmes monitored included “bast**d”, “pi** “, “a** “, and constant sexual themes and innuendo throughout.

The most concerning was Police 10 Seven on TV2 at 8pm. Expletives included “a** bit** “ and many more offensive terms which, although beeped, were written as coded subtitles but which left little to the imagination. These included “you c**ts”, “f** prick”, “f** faggot”, “f** you”, and “f** niggers”.

Also of huge concern was the number of programmes which are rated for Adult viewing only screening well after the watershed time of 8.30, yet were promoted between 6pm and 8.30pm. Examples included promos during TV1’s 6pm News for Virgin School screened at 9.30pm and Mistresses screened at 8.30pm, a promo on TV3 before 8.30 for Outrageous Fortune at 9.30pm including scenes of a strip show, and a promo for Playboy Mansion on C4 at 7pm.

“Television viewing is an integral part of family life but the so-called family watershed time is being called into question. Broadcasters are normalising the use of foul language and sexual content to children and young people.”

“This study has revealed that the term ‘broadcasting standards’ is a complete oxymoron. Parents do not want their children bombarded with foul language and sexual content – yet broadcasters are pushing the boundaries with little to no retribution,” says Mr McCoskrie.

Family First is calling for television networks to take seriously their responsibility to protect families and children from material that is offensive and disturbs or adversely influences young people’s attitudes and behaviour.

They are also calling for the development and enforcing of higher standards for TV, film, radio and advertising content including levels of violence, sexual content and objectionable language, and a complete overhaul of the BSA, ASA and Censorship Board with regular changing of board members after limited terms of office to avoid desensitisation or lack of accountability.

“Standards should be developed according to a family perspective, not an individual rights or freedom of expression perspective,” says Mr McCoskrie.

About the author

  • tvnewser

    The thing is that every family has a different opinion on what is appropriate and what is not. This group is not acting in the interest of all families, but rather the families of a select few who are involved in the group.

    I feel that television standards in NZ are pretty great, and that the main networks do a great job in providing quality programming at suitable times.

    From 7pm onwards is the time with PGR shows can screen, and they are classified as “Programmes containing material more suited to adult audiences, but not necessarily unsuitable for child viewers when subject to the guidance of a parent or adult.”

    If the families who subscribe to this group are that concerned with the content being shown then they should either turn off the TV at that time, or take the time to closely monitor what their children watch.

    It is up to each individual family to decide what is right for their children, and whether or not they want to supervise their TV viewing.

  • shantaram

    It’s difficult to appreciate your concern for foul language on television when you don’t consider ‘faggot’ or ‘nigger’ to be worth censoring in your blog, while ‘ass’ is censored.

  • tvnewser

    That’s a really good point shantaram.

  • livinginsin

    Agree with both of you Shantaram & tvnewser.
    Maybe they should just start-up their own channel. Whoops, don’t they already have one?!?
    Here’s an idea Family first. If you don’t like it, watch Shine.
    But there is a reason SKY puts it on like channel 99999. Because, it sucks. Quit trying to change others, and just focus on your own viewing choices.
    If you don’t like TVNZ and TV3, then don’t YOU watch TVNZ and TV3.
    If it really was very bad language in those times, then maybe your concerns would be legitimate. However, I don’t find a great deal of offense from words like
    ASS, BITCH and BASTARD. And apparently neither does the Standards authority.

    Get a clue.

  • Rachel

    shantaram: the press release was printed as was sent, which is interesting, isn’t it?

  • shantaram

    Yes, Rachel, it’s interesting all right.  To me, it comes across as a vain attempt by a political party to create an issue, and not a genuine appeal to broadcasters to ‘enforce higher standards’.

  • sticks and stones

    They should get their heads out of the sand and realise that there are far worse things going on in the world than a bit of harmless cussing. Seriously this kind of ridiculous crap annoys the HELL out of me!!

  • Fozzy Bear

    Ignore them. It’s the religious right trying to have their two cents worth by stirring up crap, oops, sorry “c**p“, and bending the minds of the feeble and misguided as usual. They’ve had their claws into broadcasting in the ‘States for years. Silly, shallow, pathetic. 

    What is offensive to some, isn’t to others. Harvard professor Steven Pinker wrote a very good little book called “Seven Words you can’t say on Television” which covers this subject very well. Not only on why we swear, but how some “taboo” words and phrases really don’t make any sense being outlawed.   

       

  • DaMo

    These “people” should realize that TV has changed from the 80′s and that anything (almost) goes in this era of multichannel television.

    Why do they have to spoil TV for the rest of us?