There are a couple of peculiar things about today’s press release from NZ On Air:
NZ On Air is pleased to announce support for Q + A for TV ONE and The Nation for TV3 in 2013.
Both programmes are supported through the Platinum Fund – a special contestable fund supporting programmes with something important to say about New Zealand.
“NZ On Air is committed to funding quality current affairs and we’re pleased to be able to support both The Nation and Q + A” says NZ On Air chief executive Jane Wrightson. “These programmes have proven track records for discussing important and timely issues and contributing to mainstream current affairs.”
The Platinum Fund supports content that may be currently difficult to find on our screens.
Yesterday we published some figures about how 2012 has fared for our investment. On average The Nation cost 6.6 times more per viewer per episode than Q+A and also delivers TV3 revenue via advertising due to the time and day it is broadcast.
It would be very easy to understand why NZ On Air could choose to not fund the show based on those figures. However, fund the show, it has.
What I find most interesting is the final sentence of their press release:
The Platinum Fund supports content that may be currently difficult to find on our screens.
Are current affairs shows that difficult to find on our screens now? Or is their statement an indictment on the performance of supposed current affairs shows whose role it would be assumed is to hold politicians to account and demand better performance? If that is the case, are we now on a slippery slope where broadcasters could suggest dropping their current affairs shows in the hope of getting funding in order to keep them on air? How long before we see Campbell Live and Holmes 3.0 being at least partially funded by NZ On Air?



